Abstract--Software systems usually provide numerous configuration options that can affect performance metrics such as execution time, memory usage, binary size, or bitrate. On the one hand, making informed decisions is challenging and requires domain expertise in options and their combinations. On the other hand, machine learning techniques can search vast configuration spaces, but with a high computational cost, since concrete executions of numerous configurations are required. In this exploratory study, we investigate whether large language models (LLMs) can assist in performance-oriented software configuration through prompts. We evaluate several LLMs on tasks including identifying relevant options, ranking configurations, and recommending performant configurations across various configurable systems, such as compilers, video encoders, and SA T solvers. Our preliminary results reveal both positive abilities and notable limitations: depending on the task and systems, LLMs can well align with expert knowledge, whereas hallucinations or superficial reasoning can emerge in other cases. These findings represent a first step toward systematic evaluations and the design of LLM-based solutions to assist with software configuration. Modern software systems (e.g., compilers, databases, ML pipelines) expose many configuration options impacting performance trade-offs like latency or memory usage. Identifying performant configurations and key options is challenging due to combinatorial configuration spaces and complex, non-linear interactions, making analytical reasoning impractical [1]. ML-based approaches [2]-[6], especially predictive models [7], [8], assist in configuration but require empirical performance data.

Performance-influence models are beneficial for understanding how configurations affect system performance, but their creation is challenging due to the exponential growth of configuration spaces. While gray-box approaches leverage selective "structural knowledge" (like the module execution graph of the system) to improve modeling, the relationship between this knowledge, a system's characteristics (we call them "structural aspects"), and potential model improvements is not well understood. This paper addresses this gap by formally investigating how variations in structural aspects (e.g., the number of modules and options per module) and the level of structural knowledge impact the creation of "opportunities" for improved "modular performance modeling". We introduce and quantify the concept of modeling "hardness", defined as the inherent difficulty of performance modeling. Through controlled experiments with synthetic system models, we establish an "analytical matrix" to measure these concepts. Our findings show that modeling hardness is primarily driven by the number of modules and configuration options per module. More importantly, we demonstrate that both higher levels of structural knowledge and increased modeling hardness significantly enhance the opportunity for improvement. The impact of these factors varies by performance metric; for ranking accuracy (e.g., in debugging task), structural knowledge is more dominant, while for prediction accuracy (e.g., in resource management task), hardness plays a stronger role. These results provide actionable insights for system designers, guiding them to strategically allocate time and select appropriate modeling approaches based on a system's characteristics and a given task's objectives.

Configuring the Linux kernel to meet specific requirements, such as binary size, is highly challenging due to its immense complexity-with over 15,000 interdependent options evolving rapidly across different versions. Although several studies have explored sampling strategies and machine learning methods to understand and predict the impact of configuration options, the literature still lacks a comprehensive and large-scale dataset encompassing multiple kernel versions along with detailed quantitative measurements. To bridge this gap, we introduce LinuxData, an accessible collection of kernel configurations spanning several kernel releases, specifically from versions 4.13 to 5.8. This dataset, gathered through automated tools and build processes, comprises over 240,000 kernel configurations systematically labeled with compilation outcomes and binary sizes. By providing detailed records of configuration evolution and capturing the intricate interplay among kernel options, our dataset enables innovative research in feature subset selection, prediction models based on machine learning, and transfer learning across kernel versions. Throughout this paper, we describe how the dataset has been made easily accessible via OpenML and illustrate how it can be leveraged using only a few lines of Python code to evaluate AI-based techniques, such as supervised machine learning. We anticipate that this dataset will significantly enhance reproducibility and foster new insights into configuration-space analysis at a scale that presents unique opportunities and inherent challenges, thereby advancing our understanding of the Linux kernel's configurability and evolution.

Machine/deep learning models have been widely adopted for predicting the configuration performance of software systems. However, a crucial yet unaddressed challenge is how to cater for the sparsity inherited from the configuration landscape: the influence of configuration options (features) and the distribution of data samples are highly sparse. In this paper, we propose a model-agnostic and sparsity-robust framework for predicting configuration performance, dubbed DaL, based on the new paradigm of dividable learning that builds a model via "divide-and-learn". To handle sample sparsity, the samples from the configuration landscape are divided into distant divisions, for each of which we build a sparse local model, e.g., regularized Hierarchical Interaction Neural Network, to deal with the feature sparsity. A newly given configuration would then be assigned to the right model of division for the final prediction. Further, DaL adaptively determines the optimal number of divisions required for a system and sample size without any extra training or profiling. Experiment results from 12 real-world systems and five sets of training data reveal that, compared with the state-of-the-art approaches, DaL performs no worse than the best counterpart on 44 out of 60 cases with up to 1.61x improvement on accuracy; requires fewer samples to reach the same/better accuracy; and producing acceptable training overhead. In particular, the mechanism that adapted the parameter d can reach the optimal value for 76.43% of the individual runs. The result also confirms that the paradigm of dividable learning is more suitable than other similar paradigms such as ensemble learning for predicting configuration performance. Practically, DaL considerably improves different global models when using them as the underlying local models, which further strengthens its flexibility.

When solving decision and optimisation problems, many competing algorithms (model and solver choices) have complementary strengths. Typically, there is no single algorithm that works well for all instances of a problem. Automated algorithm selection has been shown to work very well for choosing a suitable algorithm for a given instance. However, the cost of training can be prohibitively large due to running candidate algorithms on a representative set of training instances. In this work, we explore reducing this cost by choosing a subset of the training instances on which to train. We approach this problem in three ways: using active learning to decide based on prediction uncertainty, augmenting the algorithm predictors with a timeout predictor, and collecting training data using a progressively increasing timeout. We evaluate combinations of these approaches on six datasets from ASLib and present the reduction in labelling cost achieved by each option.

Robotic systems are typically composed of various subsystems, such as localization and navigation, each encompassing numerous configurable components (e.g., selecting different planning algorithms). Once an algorithm has been selected for a component, its associated configuration options must be set to the appropriate values. Configuration options across the system stack interact non-trivially. Finding optimal configurations for highly configurable robots to achieve desired performance poses a significant challenge due to the interactions between configuration options across software and hardware that result in an exponentially large and complex configuration space. These challenges are further compounded by the need for transferability between different environments and robotic platforms. Data efficient optimization algorithms (e.g., Bayesian optimization) have been increasingly employed to automate the tuning of configurable parameters in cyber-physical systems. However, such optimization algorithms converge at later stages, often after exhausting the allocated budget (e.g., optimization steps, allotted time) and lacking transferability. This paper proposes CURE -- a method that identifies causally relevant configuration options, enabling the optimization process to operate in a reduced search space, thereby enabling faster optimization of robot performance. CURE abstracts the causal relationships between various configuration options and robot performance objectives by learning a causal model in the source (a low-cost environment such as the Gazebo simulator) and applying the learned knowledge to perform optimization in the target (e.g., Turtlebot 3 physical robot). We demonstrate the effectiveness and transferability of CURE by conducting experiments that involve varying degrees of deployment changes in both physical robots and simulation.

Predicting the performance of highly configurable software systems is the foundation for performance testing and quality assurance. To that end, recent work has been relying on machine/deep learning to model software performance. However, a crucial yet unaddressed challenge is how to cater for the sparsity inherited from the configuration landscape: the influence of configuration options (features) and the distribution of data samples are highly sparse. In this paper, we propose an approach based on the concept of 'divide-and-learn', dubbed $DaL$. The basic idea is that, to handle sample sparsity, we divide the samples from the configuration landscape into distant divisions, for each of which we build a regularized Deep Neural Network as the local model to deal with the feature sparsity. A newly given configuration would then be assigned to the right model of division for the final prediction. Experiment results from eight real-world systems and five sets of training data reveal that, compared with the state-of-the-art approaches, $DaL$ performs no worse than the best counterpart on 33 out of 40 cases (within which 26 cases are significantly better) with up to $1.94\times$ improvement on accuracy; requires fewer samples to reach the same/better accuracy; and producing acceptable training overhead. Practically, $DaL$ also considerably improves different global models when using them as the underlying local models, which further strengthens its flexibility. To promote open science, all the data, code, and supplementary figures of this work can be accessed at our repository: https://github.com/ideas-labo/DaL.

Robotic systems have subsystems with a combinatorially large configuration space and hundreds or thousands of possible software and hardware configuration options interacting non-trivially. The configurable parameters are set to target specific objectives, but they can cause functional faults when incorrectly configured. Finding the root cause of such faults is challenging due to the exponentially large configuration space and the dependencies between the robot's configuration settings and performance. This paper proposes CaRE -- a method for diagnosing the root cause of functional faults through the lens of causality. CaRE abstracts the causal relationships between various configuration options and the robot's performance objectives by learning a causal structure and estimating the causal effects of options on robot performance indicators. We demonstrate CaRE's efficacy by finding the root cause of the observed functional faults and validating the diagnosed root cause by conducting experiments in both physical robots (Husky and Turtlebot 3) and in simulation (Gazebo). Furthermore, we demonstrate that the causal models learned from robots in simulation (e.g., Husky in Gazebo) are transferable to physical robots across different platforms (e.g., Husky and Turtlebot 3).

We present LTC-SE, an improved version of the Liquid Time-Constant (LTC) neural network algorithm originally proposed by Hasani et al. in 2021. This algorithm unifies the Leaky-Integrate-and-Fire (LIF) spiking neural network model with Continuous-Time Recurrent Neural Networks (CTRNNs), Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (NODEs), and bespoke Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs). The enhancements in LTC-SE focus on augmenting flexibility, compatibility, and code organization, targeting the unique constraints of embedded systems with limited computational resources and strict performance requirements. The updated code serves as a consolidated class library compatible with TensorFlow 2.x, offering comprehensive configuration options for LTCCell, CTRNN, NODE, and CTGRU classes. We evaluate LTC-SE against its predecessors, showcasing the advantages of our optimizations in user experience, Keras function compatibility, and code clarity. These refinements expand the applicability of liquid neural networks in diverse machine learning tasks, such as robotics, causality analysis, and time-series prediction, and build on the foundational work of Hasani et al.

Configurable software systems are employed in many important application domains. Understanding the performance of the systems under all configurations is critical to prevent potential performance issues caused by misconfiguration. However, as the number of configurations can be prohibitively large, it is not possible to measure the system performance under all configurations. Thus, a common approach is to build a prediction model from a limited measurement data to predict the performance of all configurations as scalar values. However, it has been pointed out that there are different sources of uncertainty coming from the data collection or the modeling process, which can make the scalar predictions not certainly accurate. To address this problem, we propose a Bayesian deep learning based method, namely BDLPerf, that can incorporate uncertainty into the prediction model. BDLPerf can provide both scalar predictions for configurations' performance and the corresponding confidence intervals of these scalar predictions. We also develop a novel uncertainty calibration technique to ensure the reliability of the confidence intervals generated by a Bayesian prediction model. Finally, we suggest an efficient hyperparameter tuning technique so as to train the prediction model within a reasonable amount of time whilst achieving high accuracy. Our experimental results on 10 real-world systems show that BDLPerf achieves higher accuracy than existing approaches, in both scalar performance prediction and confidence interval estimation.